Wednesday 10 August 2011

Tool Making - how to verify CNC machined job? Shall we believe CNC all time?

                                                     Most moldmakers are aware of the importance of accurate workpiece verification and many are now finding CNC machine simulation to be a necessity as well. The simulation and verification of CNC machining processes is becoming much more important with the increased use of high spindle speed CNC machines, five-axis machining centers and more complex fixtures and processes. What some moldmakers don’t realize however, is that the same software used to verify their increasingly complex NC programs also can be used to increase efficiency, lengthen tool and machine life, and achieve better surface finish.

NC Program Verification Basics

                                                           Machining a mold in a virtual environment is quite similar to setting up and running an actual prove-out on the machine tool. First, the user specifies the stock from which the part will be cut, either by entering dimensions into the software or using a CAD model. Then, after selecting cutting tools, the NC program is used to simulate the motion of the tool removing material from the stock. The programmer can watch the material removal process and see details of how each cut changes the shape of the part. This eliminates having to try to imagine how cuts from the current operation will affect subsequent operations.

During the cutting simulation, the software automatically detects problems such as fast feed errors, gouges and collisions that could potentially scrap the part, break the cutter or crash the machine. If an error is discovered, the programmer easily identifies the offending NC program record by mouse clicking on the error. The problem can then be fixed in the CAM software so that an error-free NC program is sent to the machine.
Analysis of the as-cut mold delves deeper into the verification process.

                             Is the resulting mold dimensionally accurate? Does it match the final desired mold shape? NC verification software enables the user to zoom in on suspect areas for in-depth inspection. The part can be rotated and cross-sectioned at any angle to check areas that would otherwise be impossible to see, such as the intersection of drilled holes. Detailed measurement tools enable the user to verify dimensions such as wall and floor thickness, hole diameters, corner radii, scallop heights, depth, gaps, distances, angles, volumes, etc.

Some simulation/optimization software also provides the ability to automatically compare the as-cut part with the original design, and includes the ability to embed the CAD design model inside the stock, automatically comparing the design to the in-process workpiece in order to reveal any differences such as gouges or excess material not removed by the machining processes.

                         After running the simulation and making sure the NC program contains no errors, and that the resulting part is dimensionally accurate and matches the design, the NC program can be run on the machine without needing to waste time machining a test part.

Optimizing High-Speed Machines for Maximum Efficiency

                   To be competitive in today’s international marketplace, NC programs need to be not only fast but efficient. In the case of machining, the most efficient NC program is the one that removes the largest volume of material in the least amount of time. But it does not typically do it using the fastest possible feedrates.

                   To create the most efficient machining processes possible, optimization software can determine the best feedrates to use for each cut. Achieving the best feedrates for each cut in an NC program is certainly a desirable goal, but it is practically impossible to do manually, especially on a large mold machining path.

                        Trying to visualize the cutter contact and cutting conditions for each cut in a large NC program, then calculating the best feedrates for the cuts, and finally manually inserting hundreds or thousands of different feedrates for each changing condition is not practical. An incorrect feedrate estimate or editing error can break the cutting tool, damage the fixture or scrap the part.

                                Without software to optimize the feedrates, the moldmaker or NC program-mer is forced to choose a single feedrate for an entire machining sequence. Because of this restriction he must choose his feedrate and machining strategy to ensure the cutter will not be overloaded and break. Thus he must choose either a slow conservative feedrate with heavier cuts, or use a machining strategy with very light cuts at a higher feedrate.

                                     How optimization software works: As the cutting tool encounters more material, feedrates decrease; as less material is removed, the feedrates speed up accordingly. Based on the amount of material removed, by each cut segment, the optimization software automatically calculates and inserts improved feedrates where necessary, and a new NC program is written, without changing the trajectory.



                           Unfortunately, in his attempt to avoid overloading or breaking the cutter, either choice results in very inefficient machining, and usually premature cutter wear. The resulting wasted time and increased costs are not tolerated in today’s internationally competitive environment.

                           The most common choice today is to select a machining strategy that allows running the machine at or near its maximum feedrate while using a small enough axial depth-of-cut so there is never an excessive removal rate that could break the cutter. While this high-speed machining technique is attractive because the machine is moving as fast as it can, it is not cutting very efficiently.

Cutting at or near a machine’s maximum feedrate, with very light cuts and a small step-down can actually create many inefficient passes and can defeat the goal of reducing time. Also, this method often results in premature cutter wear due to the light chip load. Achieving the shortest cutting time is unrelated to feedrate, but rather is directly the result of achieving the highest volume removal rate. High-efficiency machining—cutting a part in the least amount of time—is the real goal. Cutting at a greater depth than is typically recommended by most high-speed strategies is often much more efficient, but the danger is the cutter may encounter an overloaded condition—causing breakage or exceeding the horsepower on the machine. The key to achieving high-efficiency machining is to vary the feedrates to achieve the highest volume removal rate possible, while still protecting the cutter from overloading or breaking.

                                         High-efficiency machining is only possible with software that will adjust NC program cutting speeds to make the machining process faster, more efficient and of higher quality. This is a knowledge-based machining approach that uses a combination of software to detect conditions and adjust feedrates according to settings entered by each shop’s local machining expert, essentially adding intelligence to each cutter in the shop.

                                       During the simulation, the software knows the exact depth, width contact area and direction of each cut because the software also knows the exact shape of the in-process material at every instant of the machining sequence. And, it knows exactly how much material is removed by each cut segment and the exact shape of the cutter contact with the material.

                                      The precise cutter/stock geometry information can be used, for example, to calculate the maximum chip thickness for a given cut. Chip thickness is more than simply feed per tooth or the amount of advance into material for each tooth of the cutter. It is a complex 3-D modeling of the cutter and the material volume, requiring determination of the maximum engagement of the tooth into material. This calculation requires an accurate 3-D model of the instantaneous in-process material.

                                      With this unique knowledge set, optimization software determines the best feedrate for each cutting condition encountered—taking into account the volume of material removed, chip load, and machine acceleration and deceleration requirements. If desired, the software also can divide cuts into smaller segments and vary the feedrates as needed in order to maintain a consistent chip load or volume removal rate. It then creates a new NC program with the same trajectory as the original, but with improved feedrates.
Maintaining a constant chip thickness is especially important in high-speed finishing operations. As much as 40 to 60 percent of mold and die manufacturing costs are associated with the finish machining process. Reducing the time required during this phase is a significant benefit that can dramatically improve the way manufacturers do business. And, using optimization software is a way to combat the chip thinning problem, as recommended by the cutting tool manufacturers to significantly increase tool life.

Moving Beyond the Workpiece: Simulate the Entire CNC Machine

In addition to simulating and verifying that the NC program produces the correct finished part, the right simulation/optimization software should enable manufacturers to build and simulate entire CNC machines in order to eliminate potentially disastrous machine crashes. A machine crash can be very expensive, potentially ruining the machine, and delaying the entire manufacturing schedule. But by simulating the machine and machining process beforehand, the chance for error is dramatically reduced. Proving-out new programs on the machine becomes an unnecessary step saving valuable production time.

                               Machine simulation software should detect collisions and near-misses between all machine tool components such as axis slides, heads, turrets, rotary tables, spindles, tool changers, fixtures, workpieces and cutting tools. It also should detect near-misses between machine components to check for close calls, and also detect over-travel errors.

The virtual machine tool model used during simulation can be created by the user or it can be supplied by the software vendor. Using sample machines supplied with the software can be an excellent starting point to create nearly any specific machine configuration. Most importantly, a broad selection of CNC control configuration files should be supplied. These control files emulate the CNC control’s behavior and include various models of controls. Simulation of tool change, motion, cycles, sub-routines, macros, loops, etc. for all popular CNC controllers should be supported.

As expensive high-speed machining centers become more prevalent in the moldmaking industry, it becomes increasingly important that companies understand how to protect and get the most from their investment. There are a number of reasons why NC program simulation and optimization is important for high-speed machines and high-speed machining. For example, high-speed machines:
  • Cut between 10 and 50 times faster than conventional machines
  • Are very expensive
  • Use expensive and fragile cutting tools; advanced inserts, balanced cutter bodies and holders
  • Are extremely sensitive to feedrate errors
  • Are extremely sensitive to cutting volume errors (both too little and too much)
  • Must maintain optimum cutting condi-tions at all times
With high-speed machines, there is an extremely low tolerance for feedrate and spindle speed errors. By the time an operator detects an error, it is most likely too late. The nature of the machining demands that optimum cutting conditions be maintained at all times.

Documenting the Process

Optimization/simulation software should include powerful tools for creating custom reports, tailored for a specific user/department/company’s needs, containing useful process information generated during the simulation. The automatically generated documents can be used for shop floor or in-process documentation, NC programming documentation, or to capture valuable process information generated during the session.

The software also should offer highly customizable report layout in standard HTML or PDF format, which includes the ability to specify page design, fonts, graphics, tables, pictures, statistics and user-defined information critical to documenting the CNC machining process.

Additionally, optimization/simulation software should be able to be used to create robust inspection instructions in very little time. Typically, a manufacturing engineer, NC programmer or process planner manually creates these instructions to tell the machine operator what to measure and how to document the results. Without an in-process model of the part, manual methods are very tedious and prone to mistakes. Highly-customizable inspection instructions can be created by the software automatically. This helps to establish a formal, but incredibly easy and efficient method to create the necessary documentation. This feature works by using built-in measurement features together with an in-process geometry created by simulating the NC program.

Adding Value to the Mold Build Process

Simulating CAM output to view basic workpiece material removal is no longer enough in today’s incredibly competitive global marketplace. It is critical to be operating as efficiently as possible; modern simulation and optimization software has become a valuable tool to minimize the cost and time of production while maintaining or increasing product quality. It has evolved into an important process that protects and frees up CNC machines, helps to eliminate scrapped parts and creates in-process reports that can be utilized throughout the mold build process.

Tool Design - Thickness Analysis Software ..a intro...

Thickness analysis software is a CAD tool that facilitates the measurement and validation of wall thickness of 3-D CAD models. It accelerates the design review process for manufacturability, enabling designs to move to prototyping and production stages much faster. Unlike the traditional measurement tools, the right thickness analysis software should be fast and easy to use, while delivering savings in downstream costs through improvements at the design stage itself.
It should implement two main methods of thickness measurement: (1) normal ray and (2) rolling sphere, while providing the user the flexibility to select the analysis method based on the geometry of the part.

Applications

The right thickness analysis software should be integrated within a CAD application. This helps design engineers to detect inconsistent and thick/thin wall sections automatically. The designers can then reduce the possibility of internal voids, surface sink marks, warpage, unpredictable shrink rates, unnecessary resin content, longer cycle time and increased part cost .

    Thickness analysis software quickly identifies thick and thin areas on the 
      entire model. These can be corrected at the design stage itself, and design 
      engineers can core out the thick regions to reduce sink marks and also
     the cycle time




Consistent Wall Thickness:-

Design engineers need to maintain a consistent wall thickness, and any change in the wall thickness needs to be smooth, in order to ensure ease of flow and a stress-free part. Thickness analysis software that has automatic rolling sphere-based computation can help to identify regions that do not have consistent wall thickness


                 Thickness analysis software identifies change in thickness gradient



Rib Design:-
Designers follow standard design guidelines for rib design. Some of the common guidelines prevalent in the industry are:
  • Rib thickness should be 60 to 80 percent of nominal wall thickness
  • Maximum height should not exceed three times nominal wall thickness
  • Minimum spacing between ribs should be two times the nominal wall thickness
  • Thick ribs should be cored out
Cooling and Ejector Pin Location:-

                                   Molds must be provided with adequate cooling in order to take advantage of the faster cooling rates of reinforced compounds. Poor cooling rates lead to rising mold temperatures and longer cycle times. They also can result in voids, shorts and poor surface finish. So, cooling and heating channels should be located directly in the mold inserts and cores, if the mold design permits. Thickness analysis software that can automatically provide 3-D thickness on the entire model helps indentify thicker areas in the mold design, which require cooling or heating channels.

       Thickness analysis software identifies heavy sections in the mold design.

Tight Integration within CAD

Thickness analysis software should be integrated within the CAD application. This helps design engineers to check the wall thickness while designing the model.

Conclusion

The right thickness analysis software can help to identify critical wall thickness in mold design. It checks for thick/thin and inconsistent wall thickness areas that cause issues during molding. By detecting manufacturability issues at the design stage, valuable time and effort is saved by preventing costly rework at later stages.

Tool Making - CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) a intro...


   CMMs are comprised of four main components: the machine itself, the measuring probe, the control or computing system, and the measuring software.

                                      Machines are available in a wide range of sizes and designs with a variety of different probe technologies. Common applications for coordinate measuring machines include dimensional measurement, profile measurement, angularity or orientation, depth mapping, digitizing or imaging, and shaft measurement. Features common to CMMs include crash protection, offline programming, reverse engineering, shop floor suitability, SPC software and temperature compensation.



IT IS:-

             A coordinate measuring machine (CMM) is a device for measuring the physical geometrical characteristics of an object. This machine may be manually controlled by an operator or it may be computer controlled. Measurements are defined by a probe attached to the third moving axis of this machine. Probes may be mechanical, optical, laser, or white light, amongst others.

Uses                                                                 

They are often used for:
  • Dimensional measurement
  • Profile measurement
  • Angularity or orientation measurement
  • Depth mapping
  • Digitizing or imaging
  • Shaft measurement

Features

They are offered with features like:
  • Crash protection
  • Offline programming
  • Reverse engineering
  • Shop floor suitability
  • SPC software and temperature compensation.
  • CAD Model import capability
  • Compliance with the DMIS standard
  • I++ controller compatibility
The machines are available in a wide range of sizes and designs with a variety of different probe technologies. They can be operated manually or automatically through Direct Computer Control (DCC). They are offered in various configurations such as benchtop, free-standing, handheld and portable.


New Probing Systems

There are newer models that have probes that drag along the surface of the part taking points at specified intervals, known as scanning probes. This method of CMM inspection is often more accurate than the conventional touch-probe method and most times faster as well.
The next generation of scanning, known as non-contact scanning includes high speed laser single point triangulation, laser line scanning, and white light scanning, is advancing very quickly. This method uses either laser beams or white light that are projected against the surface of the part. Many thousands of points can then be taken and used to not only check size and position, but to create a 3D image of the part as well. This "point-cloud data" can then be transferred to CAD software to create a working 3D model of the part. These optical scanners often used on soft or delicate parts or to facilitate reverse engineering.


Portable Coordinate Measuring Machines

                                          Portable CMMs are different from "traditional CMMs" in that they most commonly take the form of an articulated arm. These arms have six or seven rotary axes with rotary encoders, instead of linear axes. Portable arms are lightweight (typically less than 20 pounds) and can be carried and used nearly anywhere. The inherent trade-offs of a portable CMM are manual operation (always requires a human to use it), and overall accuracy is somewhat to much less accurate than a bridge type CMM. Certain non-repetitive applications such as reverse engineering, rapid prototyping, and large-scale inspection of low-volume parts are ideally suited for portable CMMs.

Multi-Sensor Measuring Machines

Traditional CMM technology using touch probes is today often combined with other measurement technology. This includes laser, video or white light sensors to provide what is known as multi-sensor measurement..



Saturday 6 August 2011

Tool Design - DFM - Points to REMEMBER...


A1) Understand manufacturing problems/issues of current/past products:-

In order to learn from the past and not repeat old mistakes, it is important to understand all problems and issues with current and past products with respect to manufacturability, introduction into production, quality, repairability, serviceability, regulatory test performance, and so forth. This is especially true if previous engineering is being "leveraged" into new designs.

A2) Design for easy fabrication, processing, and assembly:-

Designing for easy parts fabrication, material processing, and product assembly is a primary design consideration. Even if labor "cost" is reported to be a small percentage of the selling price, problems in fabrication, processing, and assembly can generate enormous costs, cause production delays, and demand the time of precious resources.
          P1) Adhere to specific process design guidelines:-

It is very important to use specific design guidelines for parts to be produced by specific processes such as welding, casting, forging, extruding, forming, stamping, turning, milling, grinding, powdered metallurgy (sintering), plastic molding, etc. Some reference books are available that give a summary of design guidelines for many specific processes. Many specialized books are available devoted to single processes.
           P2) Avoid right/left hand parts:-

Avoid designing mirror image (right or left hand) parts. Design the product so the same part can function in both right or left hand modes. If identical parts can not perform both functions, add features to both right and left hand parts to make them the same.
Another way of saying this is to use "paired" parts instead of right and left hand parts. Purchasing of paired parts (plus all the internal material supply functions) is for twice the quantity and half the number of types of parts. This can have a significant impact with many paired parts at high volume.


           P3) Design parts with symmetry:-


           Design each part to be symmetrical from every "view" (in a drafting sense) so that the part does
           not  have to be oriented for assembly. In manual assembly, symmetrical parts can not be installed
           backwards, a major potential quality problem associated with manual assembly. In automatic
           assembly, symmetrical parts do not require special sensors or mechanisms to orient them
           correctly.

           The extra cost of making the part symmetrical (the extra holes or whatever other feature is
            necessary) will probably be saved many times over by not having to develop complex orienting
            mechanisms and by avoiding quality problems.


P4) If part symmetry is not possible, make parts very asymmetrical:-
           The best part for assembly is one that is symmetrical in all views. The worst part is one that is  
           slightly asymmetrical which may be installed wrong because the worker or robot could not notice
           the asymmetry. Or worse, the part may be forced in the wrong orientation by a worker (that thinks
           the tolerance is wrong) or by a robot (that does not know any better).

           So, if symmetry can not be achieved, make the parts very asymmetrical. Then workers will less
           likely install the part backward because it will not fit backward. Automation machinery may be
            able  to orient the part with less expensive sensors and intelligence.



P5) Design for fixturing:-

           Understand the manufacturing process well enough to be able to design parts and dimension them
            for fixturing. Parts designed for automation or mechanization need registration features for
           fixturing. Machine tools, assembly stations, automatic transfers and automatic assembly equipment
           need to be able to grip or fixture the part in a known position for subsequent operations. This
           requires registration locations on which the part will be gripped or fixtured while part is being
           transferred, machined, processed or assembled.


P6) Minimize tooling complexity by concurrently designing tooling:-
           Use concurrent engineering of parts and tooling to minimize tooling complexity, cost, delivery
           leadtime and maximize throughput, quality and flexibility.

P8) Specify optimal tolerances for a Robust Design:-
           Design of Experiments can be used to determine the effect of variations in all tolerances on part or
           system quality. The result is that all tolerances can be optimized to provide a robust design to
           provide high quality at low cost.


P9) Specify quality parts from reliable sources:-
           The "rule of ten" specifies that it costs 10 times more to find and repair a defect at the next stage
          of assembly. Thus, it costs 10 times more cost to find a part defect at a sub-assembly; 10 times
          more to find a sub-assembly defect at final assembly; 10 times more in the distribution channel;
          and so forth. All parts must have reliable sources that can deliver consistent quality over time in the
           volumes required.

The Rule of 10

Level of completion     Cost to find & repair defect
    the part itself                     X
    at sub-assembly               10 X
    at final assembly             100 X
    at the dealer/distributor 1,000 X
    at the customer             10,000 X

P10) Minimize Setups:-

For machined parts, ensure accuracy by designing parts and fixturing so all key dimensions are all cut in the same setup (chucking). Removing the part to re-position for subsequent cutting lowers accuracy relative to cuts made in the original position. Single setup machining is less expensive too.


P11) Minimize Cutting Tools:-

For machined parts, minimize cost by designing parts to be machined with the minimum number of cutting tools. For CNC "hog out" material removal, specify radii that match the preferred cutting tools (avoid arbitrary decisions). Keep tool variety within the capability of the tool changer.

P12) Understand tolerance step functions and specify tolerances wisely:-

The type of process depends on the tolerance. Each process has its practical "limit" to how close a tolerance could be held for a given skill level on the production line. If the tolerance is tighter than the limit, the next most precise (and expensive) process must be used. Designers must understand these "step functions" and know the tolerance limit for each process.

The Importance of Good Product Development


C Good product development is a potent competitive advantage.

C Product design establishes the feature set, how well the features work, and, hence, the marketability of the product.

C The design determines 80% of the cost and has significant influence on quality, reliability and serviceability.

C The product development process determines how quickly a new product can be introduced into the market place.

C The product design determines how easily the product is manufactured and how easy it will be to introduce manufacturing improvements like just-in-time and flexible manufacturing.

C The immense cost saving potential of good product design is even becoming a viable alternative to automation and off-shore manufacturing.

C True concurrent engineering of versatile product families and flexible processes determines how well companies will handle product variety and benefit from Build-to-Order and Mass Customization.


Tool Design - What is DFMA (Design for manufacturing and assembly)...

                                       Design for manufacturing and assembly (also called DFM, DFA, or together DFMA) refers to the set of tools, methods and processes for analyzing the manufacturing consequences of design decisions and improving a design in order to reduce manufacturing cost and complexity.


                                   DFMA guidelines and checklists when followed, it tend to reduce complexity and cost of production. The general idea is that if the designer has guidelines in mind during conceptual design and detailed design, they can make better decisions from a manufacturing perspective. Guidelines and checklists are only rules-of-thumb, and in some cases rules may contradict one another. Using checklists is generally helpful but is not a substitute for involving a manufacturing engineer in the design process.

DFM Guidelines

  1. Minimize Part Count: Eliminate fasteners, part consolidation
  2. Standardize Components: Take advantage of economies of scale & known component properties
  3. Commonize Product Line: Economies of scale and minimum training and equipment
  4. Standardize Design Features: Common dimensions for fewer tools and setups
  5. Keep Designs Simple: Simplest way to achieve needed functionality
  6. Multifunctional Parts: e.g.: fingernail clipper
  7. Ease of Fabrication: Choose materials easy to work with
  8. Avoid Tight Tolerances: Causes exponential cost increases
  9. Minimize Secondary & Finishing Operations: Only where needed
  10. Take Advantage of Special Process Properties: e.g.: color in injection molding

DFA Guidelines

  1. Minimize Part Count: Eliminate unnecessary parts
  2. Minimize Assembly Surfaces: and sequence them
  3. Use Subassemblies: can be assembled and tested separately, can be outsource
  4. Mistake-Proof: unambiguous, unique assembly orientation
  5. Minimize Fasteners: snap fits and part consolidation
  6. Minimize Handling: position for insertion or joining is easy to achieve
  7. Minimize Assembly Direction: ideal is to add each component from top to base
  8. Provide Unobstructed Access: consider assembly path (e.g.: oil filter)
  9. Maximize Assembly Compliance: chamfers and radii help assemble parts with variance 
so  analyse all and then start the tool design..

Tool Design - What is DFA?

                                             Design for Assembly is a process by which products are designed with ease of assembly in mind. If a product contains fewer parts it will take less time to assemble, thereby reducing assembly costs. In addition, if the parts are provided with features which make it easier to grasp, move, orient and insert them, this will also reduce assembly time and assembly costs. The reduction of the number of parts in an assembly has the added benefit of generally reducing the total cost of parts in the assembly. This is usually where the major cost benefits of the application of design for assembly occur.
             
                       
                                            Design for assembly can take different forms. In the 1960s and 70's various rules and recommendations were proposed in order to help designers consider assembly problems during the design process. Many of these rules and recommendations were presented together with practical examples showing how assembly difficulty could be improved. However, it was not until the 1970s that numerical evaluation methods were developed to allow design for assembly studies to be carried out on existing and proposed designs.

                                         The first evaluation method was developed at Hitachi and was called the Assembly Evaluation Method (AEM). This method is based on the principle of "one motion for one part." For more complicated motions, a point-loss standard is used and the ease of assembly of the whole product is evaluated by subtracting points lost. The method was originally developed in order to rate assemblies for ease of automatic assembly.

Tool Design - What is DFM?

                               Design for Manufacturability (also sometimes known as Design for Manufacturing)- (DFM) is the general engineering art of designing products in such a way that they are easy to manufacture. The basic idea exists in almost all engineering disciplines, but of course the details differ widely depending on the manufacturing technology. This design practice not only focuses on the design aspect of a part but also on the producibility. In simple language it means relative ease to manufacture a product, part or assembly.

                                            The design stage is very important in product design. Most of the product lifecycle costs are committed at design stage. The product design is not just based on good design but it should be possible to produce by manufacturing as well. Often an otherwise good design is difficult or impossible to produce. Typically a design engineer will create a model or design and send it to manufacturing for review and invite feedback. This process is called as design review. If this process is not followed diligently, the product may fail at manufacturing stage.

                                            If these DFM guidelines are not followed, it will result in iterative design, loss of manufacturing time and overall resulting in longer time to market. Hence many organizations have adopted concept of Design for Manufacturing.

                                            Depending on various types of manufacturing processes there are set guidelines for DFM practices. These DFM guidelines help to precisely define various tolerances, rules and common manufacturing checks related to DFM.

Tool Design - DFMA ...guidelines to considered..

Thursday 4 August 2011

bio-Plastics - Raw Materials -- question and Answers...

1. What is the base material of bioplastics?


                                                    Bioplastics are produced from plastic granules. Granules are either made of artificially generated polymers (polyester), of natural starch (as for example cornstarch) or natural cellulose. The cellular structure of both natural base materials can be used as a basis for the polymer. 

2. Are the granulate materials for bioplastics as sufficiently available as the traditional granules?



                                                 Currently, the demand for biogranules is far higher than the supply. For this reason the manufacturers are going to continuously enlarge their production capacities until about 2012. We can assume that only then the supply of compostable granules made of renewable raw materials will meet the needs. Therefore large manufacturers of films already conclude basic supply agreements with raw material suppliers to grant an adequate production of bioplastics for their customers.

3. Is the availability of renewable raw materials granted for the production of bioplastics without serious displacement of other cultivation areas?

                                                Due to the currently small production quantities of granules for the manufacturing of bioplastics there are neither influences on other applications of the raw materials nor influences on fields needed for the growing of the raw materials to be expected. In order to avoid future problems in terms of competition to the cultivation of food the manufacturers of the granulate materials are already using the secondary products of the renewable raw materials which are not suitable for the production of food. 

4. Why are bioplastics alleged to be better than bio petrol? Both are derived from renewable raw materials.

                        In contrast to bio petrol for cars bioplastics have two practical effects: First they serve as packaging materials and afterwards they can be reused in the recycling. Since much compost waste is combusted the warmth gained by the bioplastics can be converted into energy – bio electricity quite different.

5. Often one component of bioplastics is cornstarch. Is it true that these films may smell of popcorn?

                         Basically this would be possible as there are granules which evolve a sweet odour in the extruder. However, most of the manufacturers developed formulas which can be extruded almost entirely odourless.

6. What is OXO-degradable plastics about?

                                         Some manufacturers call their plastic products which contain metallic additives „oxo-degradable" plastics. From time to time these kinds of plastics are wrongly declared as compostable or biodegradable. The association European Bioplastics , however, has not yet known any materials which correspond to the relevant packaging standards EN 14995, EN 1343 oder EN 13432.

bio-Plastics - Some question and Answers...

1. Everybody talks about bioplastics. What exactly does that mean?

                       In industry the term bioplastics is used for various products. These products only have one thing in common: They are eco-friendlier than conventional products because they are compostable or derived from renewable raw materials.

2. Are there any interactions between the bioplastics and foods or other products?

There are no interactions known which are different to the values of traditional films in contact with food
.
3. What has to be regarded sensorially or organoleptically?

       Here bioplastics are not different to conventional PE-packaging films.

4. What happens to the bioplastics in contact with water, air and earth?

                                                          Since the decomposting procedure needs special temperatures, humidity and microorganisms, the bioplastics decay very slowly under normal environmental conditions. So it would be useful to inform the end consumer that a negligent disposal of the film in natural surroundings should be avoided.

5. May the bioplastics be composted at home?


                                              In a functioning composting system the bioplastics can be composted at home. Due to the long duration of the decomposting process and the expected suboptimal conditions in private composters we would only restrictively recommend this version of dispose.

6. How is the CO2-balance in comparison with traditional packagings?

                                                According to the standards ISO 14040 ff. CO2-balances offer a possibility to compare two products of the same kind in a company for example. Therefore, a comparison of two groups of products such as bio and conventional films is not useful. Definite statements would scientifically not be stable. As a rough guide we can say that bioplastics in comparison with conventional PE-films designed for the same application are better and produce a lower CO2 emission during their product lives. This rule of thumb is based on the fact that the production of conventional films based on fossil resources energetically is far more complex than the production of granules derived from renewable raw materials. Furthermore the disposal of conventional films (via Green Dot Germany for example) is more complex than the disposal of bioplastics.

7. Which barrier properties do bioplastics have (gas/aroma, H2O)?

                                                                Normally, bioplastics have got better barrier properties against oxygen than comparable PE-films. The barrier against steam is worse. This combination may positively influence the packed fruit and vegetable products: Humidity can escape more easily – that avoids quick moulding. Less oxygen reaches the product which may slow down the oxidation process. The product should be kept longer.

8. Bioplastics are great innovative products. But where are their limits?

                                                          Currently, bioplastics can already be used in many areas but sometimes with curtailments. High transparent films and flexible soft films are possible (for example for fruit and vegetable bags) - the research has not yet achieved a combination of these properties. Especially high transparent bioplastics are pretty stiff and inflexible whereas soft and flexible films are quite matt. Furthermore there are no biaxiale films possible.

9. What gauges can be extruded?

                                                               Nowadays, bioplastics can be extruded in single or multi-layered qualities from 15 mµ to 120 mµ. 

10. Are bioplastics as thick as comparable PE-films?

                            Generally it can be mentioned that bioplastics can be extruded 25% thinner to gain properties similar to PE-films. A reduction in weight cannot be achieved because bioplastics have got a higher density and therefore are heavier than a comparable traditional PE-film.

11. What about the strength of the new bioplastics?

                                        The strength of the seals is comparable with the values of traditional films. Bioplastics for bags of 5 kg are easily feasible.

12. Which kinds of bioplastics are there? 

Basically the term bioplastics includes three different classes of films:
1. compostable films which are not made of renewable raw materials
2. compostable films which are made of renewable raw materials
3. non-compostable films made of renewable raw materials

                              Mixtures of class 1 and 2 are possible. The part of granulate material made of renewable raw materials  is about 30-50% with an upward tendency. Films made of 100% renewable raw materials are possible but their special features only allow a limited use as packaging films.

13. Which fields of application are there for biofilms nowadays?

Nowadays, biofilms can already substitute the conventional PE-films in many areas, for example:

- compostable bin liners
- shopping bags
- Erdenfolien
- packaging films for fruit and vegetables
- packaging films for fresh meat
- brochure films for the dispatch of newspapers and magazines